That's what they call the final part of a horse race, right? And that's what we are most definitely in right now: the home stretch of our year together. For the next several weeks, we enjoy (?) a run of five-day school weeks such as we have not had since the year was very young, and then we have exams and we're done. Even a late finish does not dampen that.
Meanwhile...
E3H: Posting is still on Shakespeare. Tpics for ESC due by Friday. Drafts or partial drafts due any time.
E2H: Posting on Catcher. Focus on the girls and women in Holden's life.
Drama: Work on remaking those monologues using Stanislavski.
Strangest thing I've found today:
j: sigh of relief music: when one door closes--carrie newcomer
I know...that is not what TS Eliot said in the beginning of his epic poem "The Wasteland." What he said was:
APRIL is the cruellest month, breeding
Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
Memory and desire, stirring
Dull roots with spring rain.
But I say it has become, for us here in the high schools of the great state of Illinois, the choppiest month, displacing the previous contenders, January, November and February, for a variety of reasons.
February, a former champion, lost its title years ago when the state made acceptable the celebration of either Presidents' Day or Lincoln's Birthday and then removed the mandatory day off from the first weekend of March as well for Pulaski Day. November, home to two four-day weekends (Thanksgiving and the Veterans' Day/Parent Conference Combo) is always in the running, but there just seems to be a sense of urgency about the month, with the year still young but the semester waning and all. Things get done.
January probably should take itself out of the running. It's truly unfair as competition. With winter break and exams and MLK Day, January hardly even exists. And for our purposes here, I'm just assuming that it doesn't. (Besides, a year without a January gets to spring faster, and that has to be a plus.)
All of which takes me back to my thesis: April has become the choppiest school month of the year, quite a feat for a month which, just a decade or so ago, joined forces with May to form an impenetrable block of eight consecutive five-day school weeks following spring break. But now...
Well, let's begin with the aforementioned break, which as we know can get us back to school anywhere from around April 3 to April 7. Follow that with the not insignificant number of students who return 1-3 days late from that break and you have added to the choppiness (not to mention those whose families opt for a completely separate vacation week altogether to accommodate a different school or work schedule). This is usually followed almost immediately by a four-day week for Easter. Then there is the -two-day week we are in right now for testing, and the month is essentially over before it has really gotten started!
These days, only September and May remain as unbroken scholastic stalwarts, bookended by the year-framing holidays of Labor Day and Memorial Day, but otherwise unblemished. Perhaps the calendar gods know that this sort of thing can only be tolerated in the post-MTV generation when the month in question lies contiguous to summer.
:-)
There will be 80's this weekend...
E3H: With an eye toward the remaining weeks, we need to begin our final Writing Workshop project. Check out the ESC paper on the E3H page. begin brainstorming ideas for yours. Email me if you'd like. You may (if you'd like) begin pursuing this piece this weekend. Remember: this is a thoroughly workshopped piece, but when it is done, there is no more writing workshop...ever.
E2H: Um...
Do you know where your portfolio is?
That and whatever random Catcher posting might get done make up your weekend assignment...
Drama: OK, so here is the bit: Over the weekend, you need to select either one of the monologues that you have already done or a new short monologue from a movie or play and apply the Stanislavski System to it for performance next week. Doing so, you should write out what you discover in the system steps (enumerated below) and turn this in either in your journal or separately. If it is a monologue for which you have already scored the script, note any changes you make to the original scoring. And one very specific requirement of this project: apply a noticeable external (or more than one) to your character.
System Steps:
Given Circumstances
Magic If
Super Objective
Through-Line of Actions
Scoring the Script
Endowment
Sensory and Emotional Recall
Thinking in Images
Externals
The Creative State
Some very good points to observe when trying to understand the System can be found here. You can find additional info on Stanislavski and the System all over the web, or you may email me with questions.
E3H: Monday and Tuesday will be very important days for our Shakespeare unit. On Monday, of course, it is T-Shirt Day! Wear your Shakespeare t-shirt all day long as your outermost garment and come to class with a short presentation ready about what you have done to interpret your quotation. (You might write your quotation down; you'd be amazed how many people forget theirs...and the fact that they cannot see it while wearing it!) Tuesday we will briefly discuss the PSAE and then do more of our ongoing Shakespeare-mania.
Bring goodies on Monday! Post this weekend! Don't forget G23! Look for updates...
E2H: Monday and Tuesday we will be in Writing Workshop for the penultimate and ultimate times this year. This weekend you should post as much as you can on Catcher. Work with the topics already posted there... Don't forget G23!
Drama: Monday and Tuesday will be pretty important as we try to cover most of the remainder of Stanislavski's System. Thus far we have encountered two elements: Given Circumstances and The Magic If. I'm going to take this opportunity now to introduce you to two more.
We already understand the concept of Objectives. Stanislavski said that, as important as it is to understand our objectives from moment to moment, it is equally important to understand the overall objective we are trying to achieve in the entire course of the play. That overall objective he called the Super Objective. The playwright does not usually come out and tell you what the super objective is; you need to figure it out for yourself. But it is the character's major focus in the play. For example, one could argue that Willy Loman's super objective in Death of a Salesman is to see his son Biff get started again and his world vision vindicated. If the actor playing Willy believes that, every smaller objective is played toward this goal.
This leads directly to the fourth element, the Throughline of Actions. Over a play, patterns of action recur as a character runs into various obstacles. Sometimes the character changes objectives, sometimes he fights; sometimes he alters tactics; sometimes he bulls ahead. This pattern, taken together, becomes his ithroughline. Every action he makes (no matter how small) contributes to it.
These throughlines extend to any aspect of the play that creates sequences of actions, whether it is toward the superobjective or a smaller internal objective. If you need to start your car, there is a very clear sequence (or throughline) of actions you must go through in order to do so, and you must accomplish each of these actions successfully in order to get to the next. Robert Barton, a theatre professor from the University of Oregon, calls these "Tiny Triumphs." If you are performing a complicated role, don't try to deal with the vast complexity of it all at once; rather, break the thing down into tiny bits and play each in sequence. Succeed one tiny bit at a time, and with each tiny triumph you'll be that much closer to achieving your objective.
Over the weekend, do this exercise to develop an understanding of this concept:
Break down (and record on paper) at least three different experiences into the tiniest bits possible. Examples of eligible experiences include brushing your teeth, tying your shoes, preparing to go to bed, etc. Remember that no action is too small to consider. So "put toothpaste on brush" might itself be comprised of 20 or more discrete actions including things like "Angle the tube at 45 degrees overe the brush."
Note: Stanislavski preferred to do this as an exercise, not as a need throughout the play. But it is valuable to illustrate how an actor breaks down a role.
and for those who venture onto facebook this weekend...
j: 12 seconds music: time taketh away--cheryl wheeler silly 70's: i ain't got time anymore--the glass bottle
That is the message of that day here at Topham's Attic. It applies not only in essays but in discussions as well, which is why in E3H and E2H right now we are stressing the idea of primary source support for in-class discussion as well as for the posts on the board.
Of course you may participate without primary source references, when you have ideas that further the discussion and the texts are not handy or the specific citation is not easy to find. But what we are trying to remember is that the text is the focus of the discussion and we should always go to the text when we can.
Another aspect of our current unit is the notion that, though we can always discuss--and should, when we do not understand--what is going on in a specific scene of a book or play, we also need to examine aspects of the bigger picture: How does the issue relate to Shakespearean tragedy? How does Holden's judgmental nature relate to his maturation? Is Shakespeare showing signs in these plays of misogyny...or feminism? Is Holden's constant falling important in understanding his inability to move on with his life? There are a million questions and no class could even begin to cover them all, but what we do cover we must cover in a scholarly fashion. And that begins with more focused conversation.
Multi-tasking: You are teenagers. My teenage daughters always tell me, when I complain about their trying to do two or three (or more) things simultaneously: "Oh, Mom, I'm a teenager. We multitask!" To have truly successful conversations, that is exactly what you must learn to do: multitask during them. You must listen, first and foremost, both to avoid the embarrassment of repeating what someone just said and to develop the topic in any kind of coherent way. But simultaneously you much be thinking about your book: where are the quotations within it that you might use to further this discussion? to support what is being said? to refute it? to shift its focus to something you have more to say about?
Of course, there is a third element of multi-tasking during discussions as well: note-taking. But that, I fear, is a problem for another day. One issue at a time. :-)
E3H: Good conversations today. Informal "scoresheet": P2 wins on breadth but P5 wins on depth. In P2 we had more people involved in the conversation, but the conversational topic (feminism in Shakespeare) dug deeper and became more scholarly in P5. A virtual tie. Post online tonight to get ready for more discussion tomorrow! E2H:Much better today, guys! In your posts tonight, keep the discussion of the nuns and the ducks going, along with any elements connected to either of them either directly or thematically. Use the posts as a way to springboard into tomorrow's conversation!
Drama: Sorry I'm lecturing so much this week. We'll try to do some exercises tomorrow (or at least watfch a video or something to break up the monotony). Tonight: List seven (7) given circumstances (facts) that would be very important to know if someone were to play:
(I don't want to talk about it...) (But the computer lady did respond and says that she'll ship either today or tomorrow AM.)
E3H: Let's get specific! Bring your texts tomorrow if you haven't been, and tonight: go into them and find aspects and devices of Shakespearean tragedy that you can discuss online and in class with textual support.
E2H: We're in Catcher tomorrow. Big time!
drama: Bring in a brief (1-2 minute) example of a single person performing a scene or a moment that in your estimation is truly powerful or real.
Who says Lindsay Lohan doesn't have a sense of humor?
So I need a new computer. Can't afford one, but I need one. (Yikes! If you don't buy new stuff for a long time, it seems as if everything starts breaking down at once!) And I decided to buy it now rather than wait until this one is out of warranty this summer; that way I can have this one overhauled one more time and maybe sell it to recoup some of the outlay.
I currently have a macbook. It's been a good computer, but I admit that I've been frustrated by the fact that its capacity is smaller than I need for some of the things I do (multimedia etc) and for the files I store on it. It also gets frustratingly slow due to a smallish HD. So I decided that, this time, I'd upgrade to a macbook pro. Searching the apple.com site, I decided that I might as well go top of the line--it was only a few hundred dollars more for the fastest processor. Upgrading that to 4MB of RAM, the whole thing came to about $3300. Way too much, but what can you do?
Before buying, I went on eBay. And guess what? I found the same computer, but with eight MB RAM, and got it for the same $3300! Now all I have to do is sweat the possibility that the whole thing is a scam and I've just been ripped off for $3K...
Meanwhile...
E3H: Nice discussions today; do more posting (I added some boards and sub-boards) and we'll keep them going tomorrow!
E2H: WW tomorrow! Portfolio is due in 13 days!!!
Drama: We're deep in History/Stan-land.
j: "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." --Douglas Adams music: procrastination--amy winehouse
It feels very odd to be out for the weekend on a Thursday night.
After 8th period ended today I had a surprise visit from a former student who graduated in 1992! I had not heard from him since then, so it was quite a stunner when he walked into my room carrying his four-year-old son Joshua. We chatted for nearly an hour: very cool. When he graduated, we had just finished LFHS's first massive build-out, the one that added the pool and the fieldhouse along with the entire rear of the building. He remembered swimming for LFHS when our pool was located in what are now the classrooms in the library!
Anyway...
Here's some stuff for the long weekend:
E3H: work on your t-shirts, but also go online and start posting about the Shakespeare plays. Perhaps an initial focus might be how they differ from the movie versions, or you might try looking for ways in which they vary from the structure of Sophocles' tragedies...
E2H: don't forget your "beach read" reviews are due next week, and also go online to begin conversations about Catcher in the Rye. Boards are open. :-)
Drama: final performances on Monday and then: we will work on the first stage of our final project, which involves learning something about the history of theatre and a dude named Constantin Stanislavski.
The Cubs started with a win. So where was that ability in October???
E3H: Go to the Shakespeare T-Shirt page and put those thinking caps on! Due on April 20! Bring RW and Shakespeare tomorrow.
E2H: Bring RW and Catcher tomorrow.
Drama: More good stuff today. We won't be doing the rest until Thursday. Tomorrow: bring (in writing) an improvisational activity or game that you would like to play. We'll do several of them in class as time permits, but everyone should have one. Don't forget: everyone should be writing responses to the day's performances in their journals!
Here's a bit of silliness, a new take on an old song:
(I published this yesterday...but to the wrong blog!)
"I'm dreaming of a white Easter..."
I can hear the carolers outside singing Easter carols as the aromas of gingerbread and hot chocolate filter through my home. Somewhere, the Easter Bunny is getting ready for his annual journey on his magical sled pulled by eight tiny reinmice through a winter wonderland of candy-colored egg-shaped ornaments, and people who almost never go to church are preparing to attend because it seems like the right thing to do.
Haven't we been here before? Say, about 14 or 15 weeks ago?
Arrgh!
I don't know if I have ever mentioned this, but...
I HATE WINTER!!!!
E3H: Bring in your Shakespeare tomorrow; we'll either be discussing a play or we'll be doing something else connected to the Bard of Avon.
E2H: It's WW tomorrow. Bring in drafts!! Countdown to portfolio: 21/11!
Drama: Good start today; more tomorrow.
j: welcome to spring (?) quarter music: spring is late this year--lowen and navarro
Hi, everyone, and welcome back to another (or your first) year at LFHS.
What you have heard is true. The English teacher has lost her ever-loving mind and is not going to be giving any grades at all in her classes this year. Not. One.
There will be no percentages, no numbers, no scores, no letters, no anything that will count toward anything that will end up being averaged for a final grade. But before you call in the men with the white coats, let me explain:
As I hope you have read in the doc your son or daughter (I have always hated the phrase "your student" when addressed to a parent) should have showed you, there is a wealth of research that indicates that grades--or the need to achieve them--are the single greatest thing that stand in the way of a great education. Studies show that the most influential thing a teacher can do to help a student grow academically is to allow him or her to self-grade. Most teachers would rather climb Mt. Everest dressed only in a swimsuit.
But the thing is: our academic system is severely broken. We say that our goal is to get our students to master Common Core Standards, and that is all well and good. But if that is truly the goal, then why do we care how long it takes them to master them? I'm serious. Think about it this way:
Try to remember back to when you were learning how to ride a bike. Oh, it was scary. You needed all kinds of support at first, lots of help from Daddy or Mommy. Then they let go and you were very, very wobbly. Probably you fell off, maybe several times. It took quite a while before you completely mastered the skill. But when you had...you had it down perfectly for the rest of your life.
Now imagine if you were being graded on that learning experience the way schools grade you. We would not score those first scaffolding attempts with Mommy and Daddy, but then...oh, you failed those quizzes when you fell off. And those wobbly rides? C's at best. Then a bunch of B's probably before you finally settled into 100% forever. But if we graded you right at that point, you'd probably average, oh, 83% or so. Why?You've mastered the skill perfectly. So why do you not get 100% if that is what we say we care about? Why on earth do we care about all those earlier times when you didn't have it down yet?
That will be what we go for here. Students will know what the goals are. They will understand what an "A" student looks like. And they will know when they have mastered an objective. Those who do so earlier than others will become tutors to those who have not yet done it: everyone gains from this and the newly learned skills, instead of being quickly forgotten as things studied for a test usually are, will continue being applied as masters tutor their classmates.
That is an awful lot to imagine will happen because I don't give grades this year, but what the heck: if you don't dream big, you never win big, right? The research is behind this, as is the school administration. I'm happy--well, actually I am excited--to pilot this concept at LFHS. As always, I'm glad to discuss this or anything else with you.